Many multinational groups have a corporate structure that includes an ‘IP holding’ company located in a no/low tax jurisdiction, such as Singapore or Ireland. This type of arrangement (which is generally based on a suite of legal agreements between the members of the group) often has the IP holding company as the legal owner of
Australian start-ups are often cash-poor – and IP costs money. We get that. To that end, Shelston IP’s “Cleantech” team is constantly on the lookout for ways in which our local start-up community can combine the “necessary evil” of expenditure on intangible assets with funding sources specifically dedicated to such purposes. With ARENA, we may
In GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Limited v Generic Partners Pty Limited  FCAFC 71, the Full Federal Court has found that terms used in claims cannot be interpreted beyond their plain meaning. Such a decision emphasises that great care is required when drafting claims that contain words or phrases that have a
ESCO Corporation v Ronneby Road Pty Ltd  FCAFC 46 We previously reported the Federal Court decision in Ronneby Road Pty Ltd v ESCO Corporation  FCA 588 (https://www.shelstonip.com/news/court-finds-claims-lack-utility-not-satisfying-composite-promise-patent-specification/) in which all claims of ESCO Corporation’s (“ESCO”) patent application AU 2011201135 for a Wear Assembly were found to lack utility on the basis that
Our colleagues at Glasshouse Advisory summarise last night’s budget which contains inexplicable cuts to the R&D Tax Incentive program, which combined with other key Budget measures will have a negative impact on Australia’s innovation ecosystem. However, there is a sleeper issue hidden in the Budget papers that provides insight into the reasons why this has happened.
The Australian Government has announced an independent review of the Defence Trade Controls Act 2012. Local inventors (and indeed, patent attorneys) may think “so what? Unless I’m looking to patent a weapon, how is this remotely relevant to me?” Well, if your invention falls into what’s termed the “dual use” category – inventions having potential